Reactions of Innocent People versus Guilty People

REACTIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE versus GUILTY PEOPLE

I was in federal law enforcement for 25 years. One of the most important lessons you learn very early in your career is the following. When someone is accused of committing a crime, or crimes, guilty and Innocent people react very differently. In general, their reactions are the exact opposite of how one could possibly respond to the allegations against them.

INNOCENT PEOPLE

  • When they are accused of a crime, or crimes, which they did not commit, innocent people become outraged over a false allegation, and immediately deny all responsibility.
  • They fully cooperate with law enforcement as in 100%.
  • They don’t lawyer up.
  • They agree to take one or actually request a polygraph exam.
  • They voluntarily allow law enforcement to search their phone, car, and/or home for evidence.
  • They allow law enforcement to examine their bank and financial records.
  • If it’s relevant, they volunteer to provide their DNA.
  • They do this because they want a complete and thorough investigation. Why? Because they know law enforcement will not find any evidence of a crime. The investigation will instead confirm their innocence.

GUILTY PEOPLE

  • Instead of becoming outraged, offended, and immediately denying the charge or charges, they become very defensive.
  • They accuse law enforcement of planting evidence and/or framing them.
  • They try to block the investigation in every way possible.
  • They immediately lawyer up.
  • They refuse to take a polygraph.
  • They tell the police if they want to search their phone, car, or home, they must obtain a search warrant.
  • They try to hide their bank and financial records from law enforcement.
  • If DNA is requested, they refuse!
  • In other words, they react in the opposite manner of an innocent person.
  • They try to block every aspect of the investigation because they know it will eventually prove they are guilty.

When you read about Trump’s reaction to the criminal charges filed against him by NY and the federal government, ask yourself if he responds like an innocent or guilty person. OK, you can stop LOL because the answer to that question is incredibly obvious.

The answer to the question above may be obvious to you, but millions of Trump Cult members fall for the Trump scam. What is that scam? I am not guilty of stealing hundreds of Top Secret – Classified documents, I am being framed by a corrupt FBI and Justice Department, who maliciously filed 37 Felony charges against me. Is that the reaction of an innocent or a guilty person?

If you don’t follow or read about Trump Cult members, you will be shocked by the following. In their world, they believe Trump and agree that both the FBI and Justice Department are thoroughly corrupt, and Trump is a symbol of honesty and integrity. They also believe Trump is a victim of those two corrupt, government agencies.

Trump cult members aren’t worried about him endangering national security or possibly being a traitor. No, they’re upset with the Justice Department for investigating and then charging him with federal crimes. In their minds, the government has no right to investigate and/or charge their Supreme Leader. How scary is that?

Former VP Mike Pence, who’s running for President, recently commented on this issue. Pence said, if elected, he will clean house at the corrupt Justice Department.  You expect that type of behavior in Russia, not the U.S. That’s the prevailing view in the Trump World. If a fascist mindset like this doesn’t scare you, it should. Remember when the Republican Party was proud to call themselves the party of Law & Order?

In New York, the DA charged Trump with 34 Corporate Fraud Felony charges. What was the reaction in the Republican Party? They weren’t upset with Trump for allegedly committing those crimes, they instead demanded an investigation of the NY District Attorney.  Do you ever remember any political party going after prosecutors for investigating crimes and then charging those who violate the law? This is fascist insanity, but it’s the kind of behavior one expects from a cult.

In both the NY and Federal cases, Trump World has no evidence of corruption on the part of the DA or the Justice Department. Remember, in Trump World, evidence/proof is classified as Fake News, they believe what they are told by the Fox Propaganda network.

Their bogus conclusion is the following. If the New York DA and the Justice Department have the nerve to charge Trump with committing crimes, they must be corrupt. Once again, this is typical cult behavior. Remember, their Supreme Leader is never wrong, and nobody is allowed to challenge or criticize what he does or says. Cult members never use logic, facts, proof, or evidence. In addition, they have no relationship with the truth.

 

U.S. CRIMINAL LAWS FOR MURDER ARE INSANE

U.S. CRIMINAL LAWS FOR MURDER ARE INSANE

How many times have you read an article about a vicious murder, only to learn the person who committed the crime has a rap sheet longer than your leg? You see it way too often. The criminal was previously arrested for assault, rape, attempted murder, etc. If you’re like me, you ask yourself how or why is this horrible person walking around free? Why aren’t they locked up in a cage for the rest of their lives?

I’m writing this just after a serial killer in Texas, named Raul Meza, turned himself in. He was wanted for 2 murders in Austin, TX. After he turned himself in, he advised the police that he committed two other murders in San Antonio, TX. Authorities believe he may have killed several other people.

In 1982, Raul Meza was convicted for the rape and murder of an 8-year old girl. Guess what? He served only 11 years and was paroled in 1993. You read that correctly. A guy who raped and murdered an 8-year old girl, served only 11 years in prison for that vicious crime. This is a prime example of what is wrong with our criminal justice system. The emphasis should not be on parole or rehabilitation for murderers, it should be on protecting society from vicious killers.

After Meza was released, there’s a long list of people whom he murdered. Obviously, if Meza was locked in a cage for the rest of his life after the 1982 rape and murder of that young girl, numerous innocent people would be alive today.

The treatment of Meza described above is symbolic of so many other cases across the country. Why in the world does our justice system demonstrate so much undeserved empathy toward murderers?

What is wrong with our criminal justice system? Why do vicious killers, who rape and/or murder people, serve such short sentences? Why are they released on parole?

Remember, murder is a permanent crime. The victim and their family will never recover. That’s why the punishment should also be permanent, that means the rest of the criminal’s life. After committing a murder, a prisoner should never be released, so that he or she can do it again.

Let’s take a moment to review the various levels of charges one might face for the murder of someone. Please note, the following list is not all inclusive, it’s more of a generic summary.

First Degree Murder

It is the most severe homicide crime and the criteria is premeditated and carried out with intent. This could result in the death penalty, which is almost never actually imposed. More often, life in prison without the possibility of parole, is the sentence. In America, if you get the death penalty, you’re almost assured of at least another 15-20 years living on death row. See more on this at the end of this article.

However, some judges give out a sentence such as only 15 or 25 years to life. Why? Put them away forever!

Second Degree Murder

Second-degree murder is carried out with intent but with no premeditation. This one often carries a pathetic sentence like 15 years to life.

Third Degree Murder

Third-degree murder falls between manslaughter and second-degree murder charges. This murder is not based on having the intent to kill. Third-degree murder is often charged as a depraved heart or mind crime. This charge can arise when a person fires a gun in a crowd without intending to kill anyone. Do you or I really care if he or she intended to kill someone? Firing a weapon into a crowd is more than enough for me to lock up this person forever.

Manslaughter

Your behavior shows you don’t care if someone dies because of your actions (voluntary manslaughter). You accidentally cause another person to die (involuntary manslaughter).

Attempted Murder

Attempted murder is the failed or aborted attempt to murder another person.

In some states “Attempted 1st Degree Murder” can carry a sentence of life in prison with the possibility of parole. Unfortunately, that kind of sentence is very rare. In most states, more often than not, attempted murder carries a maximum penalty of only 15 years. Very often, the actual sentence is even lower.

Unfortunately, our justice system usually rewards the criminal for failure. If you attempt to kill someone and succeed, you will probably receive a very serious sentence. However, if you try to kill someone, but fail to achieve your goal, the criminal justice system often rewards you with a very light sentence. How dumb is that?

Death Penalty

In 1976, the death penalty was reinstated by the Supreme Court. Since then, only 1,569 men and women have been executed in the United States. Incidentally, most of those executions were concentrated in a few states.

1,569 may sound like a large number, but over 47 years, that comes to only   33 per year. How many murders are committed in America annually? I don’t have the exact number, but it averages out to approximately 21,000 per year. Yes, out of every 21,000 murders annually, there are approximately only 33 death penalty cases each year

Let’s do the math.

21,000 x 47 years = 987,000 murders since 1976

How many people were put to death? 1,569. That means the death penalty is applied in America only about 2% of the time. Or looking at it from the opposite direction, in about 98% of murders cases, there is no death penalty applied.

If you’re like me, you are angry that the death penalty isn’t utilized far more often. However, it should only be applied when the guilty person confesses, or if there is 100% scientific proof. It should never be used in a circumstantial evidence case.

It doesn’t matter how you personally feel about the death penalty and/or how rarely it’s used. What matters is we keep the threat of a death penalty hanging over the head of murderers. Why? Because you would be amazed how many times a murderer pleads guilty to a lesser charge to avoid the death penalty.

Conclusion

We need a justice system that emphasizes punishment over rehabilitation for violent offenders. People who rape, seriously injure, or kill others, deserve to spend the rest of their lives locked in a cage. This type of sentence places the emphasis on protecting society from people who will kill someone for a trivial reason. They simply do not care about others.

Why should we demonstrate empathy for these cold-hearted killers? Why does our criminal justice system demonstrate such a high level of concern for violent offenders? You can bet every dollar you have, if the judge was sentencing a killer who murdered one of his loved ones, that murderer would never see the light of day again. We need judges who place themselves in the position of a family member who just lost a loved one forever.

Homicides and Death in America and Around the World

Deaths and Homicides in America and Around the World

Introduction and Caveats

Homicide stats are very interesting because they help illustrate trends in our society. Keep in mind, the only reliable homicide stats are long term. In other words, one cannot make judgements based upon the numbers for only 1 or 2 years. Generally, that means one shouldn’t start drawing conclusions until they’ve examined the numbers and patterns for at least 5-7 years.

For example, New York City might have a spike in homicides over a 1 or 2 year period, but it could be an anomaly, caused by something such as a pandemic. However, if you examine the numbers over a 5-7 year time frame, they are more meaningful. Nonetheless, I’m going to push on and hope you find these stats are as interesting as I do.

Note: Some of the numbers below are from the year 2020 and some are from the year 2021. Please keep in mind that all the numbers for 2021 aren’t yet final. In addition, the numbers from various studies are different.  You might find one study which states there were 17,500 homicides in a specific year and another one may have a very different number for the very same year. I can’t explain why.

Therefore, I try to use the term approximate numbers. More importantly, I cannot verify the accuracy of the statistics, but I’m confident they are relatively close to the actual number of murders.

Here’s a generic gender-based summary of homicides in America.

  • Males are more likely to be murder victims (76.8%).
  • Females are most likely to be victims of domestic homicides (63.7%) and sex-related homicides (81%).
  • Males are far more likely to be the perpetrator who commit homicides.

As scary as some of these numbers are, please keep in mind that most deaths are caused by natural factors such as heart disease or cancer. Here’s another depressing number to think about. In America, an estimated 42,915 people died in motor vehicle traffic accidents in 2021. That’s a staggering statistic! Last year, approximately 117 people died every day in a motor vehicle accident. Tell me that isn’t a mind-boggling number.

That’s very interesting, but in this article, as mentioned above, we’re going to primarily focus on homicides in America. We’re also going to take a quick look at global homicide rates, which will hopefully give us a perspective on how we compare with the rest of the world.

  • We’re going to focus on 2020, when the homicide rate surged, and also 2021, where it continued to rise significantly.
  • In America, there were about 20,000 murders in 2020. We don’t have the exact number yet for last year, but that total rose significantly in 2021
  • At this point in time, approximately 55 – 60 people are murdered every day in America.
  • As mentioned earlier in this article, the vast majority of victims were males.

2020 murders number by race

  • 7,029 white people and 9,913 black people were murdered in 2020..
  • Even though they make up about 12-13% of the population, more than 53% of homicides are committed against black people.
  • The other category [not black or white] accounted for 497 In addition, there were 315 murders where race was unknown.
  • Firearms accounted for 77% of the murders, the majority of them were handguns.

Are Homicides America’s Biggest Concern?

Americans primarily concentrate and focus upon the Murder Rate. That’s what we read online and in the newspapers, because it’s obviously a fascinating topic for many of us. Our TV series and movies almost always are about murders and the people who commit those crimes. I definitely fall into that category as I’m mesmerized by Dateline, 48 Hours, and Investigation Discovery.

But maybe we should ask ourselves if it’s time to rethink our priorities and concentrate on a far more prevalent form of death, which are not classified as murder?

  • The U.S. Murder Rate in 2020 was approximately 40% lower than the suicide rate.  In 2020, there were about 46,000 suicides in America. Compare that with about 20,000 murders that same year.
  • The U.S. Murder Rate in 2020 was significantly lower than deaths caused by a drug overdose. There were approximately 92,000 deaths from a drug overdose versus 20,000 homicides in 2020. That means drug overdoses account for more than 4X the number of deaths versus homicides.
  • Far more Americans die annually from suicide and drug overdoses than they do from homicides. Did you know that? It doesn’t change the horrible impact of the homicide numbers, but it does provide a slightly different perspective. I’m sure most Americans have no idea that suicide and drug overdoses are so prominent. Obviously we concentrate almost solely upon homicide. Is that a mistake?

Global Homicide Statistics

  • In 2020 approximately 304,000 men and boys worldwide were killed.
  • In the year 2020, about 80 per cent of global homicide victims worldwide were men or boys. Most of the victims were between the ages of 15 and 29.
  • Women and girls account for slightly less than 20% of all homicide victims.
  • In 2020, approximately 47,000 women and girls worldwide were killed by their intimate partners or other family members.
  • About 90 per cent of all homicides recorded worldwide were committed by male perpetrators

Homicide Rates in Different Countries

  • El Salvador has the highest murder rate in the world. Other countries with a high rate of homicide include Honduras, Venezuela, Jamaica, Belize, South Africa, and Nigeria.
  • Countries with the lowest murder rate include Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Luxembourg, Indonesia, Norway, Oman, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, and China
  • The United States global ranking for homicides is number 59. That was definitely a surprise to me.
  • Asia has the highest rate of murders for women.

Interesting Numbers

  • The homicide clearance rate [cases solved] was 82% in 1976. In 2020 it was down to approximately 51%. Wow!
  • There are so many variables which explain that decline. Unfortunately, we don’t have the time to examine them. But in general, cultural changes, technology, and police methodologies are key factors.

I hope you found the numbers detailed and described above interesting.

America’s Insane Drug Laws

I was told that Einstein’s definition of insanity is repeating the same behavior over and over while expecting a different outcome. We’ve been repeatedly trying, for over a half century, to stem the tide of illegal drugs using the same failed approach. Yet we probably have more illegal drugs available today, than at any time in recent history. I remember when the head of DEA was on national television a few years ago explaining that on their best days, DEA keeps about 5% of the drugs from coming into our country. Why does America persist in following a strategy which always proves to be a failure? Let me take a moment to point out that I detest those illegal drugs, but I’m smart enough to realize we can’t stop people from using them.

How many times have you seen a press conference where DEA or the FBI announces the arrest of a drug kingpin? The formula is almost always the same. It took them 2-3 years, sometimes longer, to gather enough evidence for a conviction. What they usually leave out of the equation are the millions of dollars the investigation cost the taxpayers. And sometimes, it’s more than money, as lives are often lost during their pursuit of the cartel leader. But in the end, DEA, the FBI, or a local law enforcement agency, makes an effort to proudly tell us the time, money, and/or lives was worth the effort. Really? Only foolish people should believe that BS.

What happens after a drug kingpin is arrested? It’s usually one of two things. Someone in the cartel takes the place of the leader who was arrested, and after a brief period of adjustment, they continue to smuggle drugs into American cities as if nothing happened.

But occasionally the arrest does enough damage to an organization, that they can no longer function at the same level of efficiency. But guess what? If that happens, one of their competitors will take over and we’re right back where we started. However, before that competing gang takes over, there’s usually an extended period of extreme violence, as both gangs compete for the right to earn huge amounts of money, selling drugs in America.

This is a cycle which America has repeated endlessly for the past 50 years or so. Yet, for whatever reason, we keep on doing the same thing over and over. We never learned our lesson from Prohibition, when the Christian right tried to impose their version of morality on America. That was way back in the 1920s and it quickly became a fiasco. It didn’t change our moral values, and it certainly didn’t stop the flow of alcohol into the hands of our citizens. But it did succeed in transforming the Mafia from a group of small, local gangs, into a national powerhouse. The government gave criminals a golden opportunity and they seized that moment in time to change American culture, in a negative manner for many decades. Ironically, Prohibition not only failed in its goal to change morality, it set us on a path which led to the deaths of countless thousands, at the hands of what became much more powerful organized crime syndicates.

Fast forward to the creation of our drug laws and it became a huge opportunity for gangs in every major city, as well as newly developed Drug Cartels in countries outside of America. Much of the violent crime and murders in our cities are gangs fighting turf wars over the profits from the sale of illegal drugs. Chicago is a prime example of a city where the lives of many are extinguished in part because of foolish, futile drug laws. The drug laws have created problems which are far worse than the use of narcotics. The biggest achievement of our drug laws is making the production and sale of illegal drugs a financial bonanza for violent criminals. It sounds just like prohibition, doesn’t it?

Those who watch Fox are obsessed with illegal immigration at the Mexican Border. Many of those people are fleeing countries which are run by violent gangs, fueled by drug trafficking profits. Eliminating the drug laws will almost certainly reduce the level of illegal immigration at our southern border.

Please understand that our drug laws took an addiction/health issue and turned it into a massive criminal problem. More than half of all crimes committed in America are drug related. Imagine what would happen if we changed that equation. I have no sympathy for drug users, but we should understand that drug addicts have the same addiction problem which heavy smokers and drinkers have. Why do we single out drug users and turn them into criminals? Why don’t we treat them as people who need help, just as we do with heavy smokers and alcoholics?

I think you can guess what my approach would be, but how would you change our failed drug laws? It’s obvious that law enforcement has proven to be a total failure over the past half century. Therefore, we need a brand-new  approach, which enables people to get help with their addiction, without becoming criminals and/or dealing with drug dealers. What solutions do you believe would work better? Please keep in mind that whatever you come up with, it couldn’t be any worse than what we’ve experienced throughout our lifetime.

Police Continue Murdering Unarmed Black People

The death of George Floyd was one of many murders committed by white police officers against unarmed black people around the country. Many of these occur during minor traffic offenses or routine police calls, where there is no lethal threat to the officer. Here’s another case which defies credibility.  Louisiana State Police and Iberia Parish police, said Victor White III shot himself in the chest while handcuffed behind his back, as he was sitting in the rear seat of an Iberia Parish, LA police car. The events, which happened in 2014, are mind boggling.  Please note that the facts and events of the case I listed below, came from the arresting officer.

Victor White III, was a 22 year old son of a reverend. He was arrested for possession of narcotics by Iberia Parish police officer Justin Ortis six years ago.

  • The arresting officer testified that he thoroughly searched White twice. He found no weapons on him, but he did find a small amount of cocaine during that 2nd search.
  • The arresting officer transported White back to the police station.
  • The officer turned off the police car camera which points towards the rear seat.
  • Instead of stopping directly in front of the police station, the officer parked in a dark section of the parking lot, at the furthest point from the station.
  • There were no surveillance cameras at that dark, isolated location. 
  • The officer claims White refused to get out of the police car and then he heard a shot.
  • White was fatally wounded. 

Here’s the part which defies credibility. Despite being handcuffed behind his back (per the arresting officer), while sitting in the rear seat of a patrol car, the Police department claims the following. White, who is LEFT handed, miraculously found a gun and shot himself in the right / front side of his chest. What? 

  • After he was thoroughly searched twice, per the arresting officer, where did the weapon come from? 
  • Forget the question of why a 22 year old would want to commit suicide, how could a left handed man handcuffed behind his back, shoot himself in the right / front chest?  
  • The police car was equipped with a camera which points towards the rear seat. The officer turned off that camera. Why?
  • Why didn’t the arresting officer park directly in front of the police station? Why did he park in a dark, isolated section of the parking lot where there were no cameras? 

The coroner incredibly ruled his death was a suicide, so the officer was never charged.